One workflow map
Input, missing detail, owner, human review point, proposed next action, and final handoff.
Founder-priced · Non-production · Human-reviewed
For HVAC, plumbing, electrical, landscaping, and field-service teams
Make one stuck handoff visible in seven business days.
A tightly bounded proof sprint for one recurring exception between inquiry, quote, schedule, job, and invoice. We use synthetic or redacted examples and keep your existing tools in place.
$250 for the first two qualified proofs. No credentials, APIs, live integrations, or customer records.
One queue · one owner
Review before anything moves.
Input and sourceshow
Missing detailmark
Human next actionapprove
1 queueOne named exception, such as a sent quote with no response.
3 scenariosAgreed synthetic or redacted examples before work starts.
1 reviewerOne person confirms whether the workflow reflects team logic.
What you receive
A decision artifact, not a vague prototype.
The sprint is complete when the team can inspect the workflow, challenge it, and decide whether a larger step is worth considering.
One review queue
At most ten synthetic or redacted records showing the three agreed exception scenarios.
One working session
A 30-minute review and one consolidated revision, delivered within seven business days.
What it does not include
Boundaries are part of the product.
No access
No credentials, APIs, live integrations, migration, configuration, production access, or live customer data.
No autonomy
No automated messages, dispatch, scheduling, purchasing, customer contact, or financial-record changes.
No inflated claims
No compliance, security certification, savings, revenue, clinical, or client-result claims.
No hidden retainer
No ongoing support or production implementation is included. A separate written scope would be required.
Why this shape
Designed around evidence, not platform replacement.
Jobber and QuickBooks documentation show why exceptions and handoffs matter between existing tools. GOV.UK and HMPPS examples support structured intake, centralized review, human challenge, and visible audit points. Those sources do not prove home-service results, so this sprint is explicitly a proof of workflow fit, not a promise of savings.